Thursday, February 26, 2009

Tip of the iceberg: It ain't the banks joe

I keep hearing pundits talking about fixing the banks, but the banks are lending, what is not functioning, at all, is the secondary market, aka the shadow banking system.




The first striking element of this report (from mid 2007, nearly 2 years ago!) is the over 50% increase in leveraged loans coming due in 2010-2014 vs 2009, from ~$120B to ~$200B. We currently are in the proverbial eye of the storm for the hurricane of leveraged loans coming due.


In a normal market, this would not matter, the loans would simply be rolled over. Unfortunately, the secondary market for this type of loan product, which is almost always below investment grade or the lowest investment grade (BBB), is more or less dead.


This poses an enormous problem for all the leveraged buyouts that occurred in the 2003-2007 timeframe. The cashflow from the loans may cover interest payments, but when the loans come due, the assumption has always been that rollover funds will be available, at some interest rate, but we are encountering situations where said funds are not available at ANY interest rate.


This will likely lead to asset sales, in an already depressed market, which will further lower the value of the assets held on the books of other companies (mark to market), which will erode market confidence which will further impact the functioning of capital markets and so on and so forth. These events may lower credit ratings and trigger painful covenants for lines of credit as well as create tremendous operating difficulties for these firms in terms of short term credit needs.


Notice the last page of the report..and this is critical... banks have made up a small fraction of the lending in recent years.


In fact, the first words of page three read: "Many highly leveraged firms rely on their ability to roll over existing loan debt rather than repay it at maturity; something they often lack the financial resources to do. In fact, for riskier borrowers, the ability to tap the loan market for liquidity can be of significant importance in maintaining solvency and avoiding default"


It goes on to state "Non-bank institutional investors, such as CLO's and hedge funds, have become a driving source of liquidity in the leveraged loan market. In 2006, institutional issuance account for about 60% of all leveraged loan issuance."


Well, we know where most of the hedge funds and CLO's are, either dead or in hiding.


What's worse is the coincidence of leveraged loan maturation with high yield junk bond maturation. "Refunding needs for junk-rated U.S. issuers more than doubled to $190 billion over the next three years, the highest figure recorded since Moody’s began its annual study 11 years ago. Refunding needs were just $86 billion in last year’s study.The $190 billion of maturing bank facilities and bonds includes $26 billion due in 2009, $44 billion due in 2010, and $120 billion due in 2011, Moody’s report said."


This compares to $13 billion in junk bond refunding in 2008.


The problem is not one of banks, it's one of the secondary markets, which are all but dead, and for which there is a fat chance in hell that the government would step in and back (since they are painted as the evildoers responsible for the current situation).




Saturday, February 21, 2009

Why Ford > GM > Chrysler

Oil and Gas Companies

Company, 2008 Market Cap, CEO Educational Background
1) ExxonMobil $366 B: Civil Eng.
2) BP CEO $133 B: Geology
3) Chevron CEO $131 B: Chemical Eng.
4) ConocoPhillips $ 75 B: Business
5) OXY CEO $ 37 B: Chemistry
6) Encana CEO $ 32 B: Petroleum Eng.
7) Devon CEO $ 32 B: Geology



Notice a common thread?



Oil and gas companies are defined by their ability to explore and produce. E&P is the lifeblood of the company. Notice how the largest oil and gas companies, integrateds and independents alike, are run by either engineers or geoscientists?







At its core, a vehicle company is defined by its vehicle engineering. I'm wondering, perhaps vehicle companies should be run by engineers?





Toyota's ascent to become a global vehicle superpower occurred under two engineers

Toyota:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eiji_Toyoda (Engineer)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shoichiro_Toyoda (Engineer)

Whereas its recent disastrous expansion into pickups as well as its construction of factories in Japan on the basis of short term currency foreign exchange rates that has contributed heavily to the first loss in dozens of years was the result of

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katsuaki_Watanabe (Economics major)

Notice how Ford has performed far better than Chrysler and GM?

Chrysler:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Nardelli (Business major)

General Motors:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rick_Wagoner (Economics major)

Perhaps because you have this engineer at the helm, Ford has outperformed:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alan_Mulally (Engineer)

As soon as Alan Mulally came to the helm at Ford he mortgaged all the assets at the height of the credit boom, because of liquidity concerns, whereas the CEO's of Chrysler and GM sat on their laurels...

Speaking of Chrysler, someone at Daimler had the foresight to jettison the brand before it took down the maker of the Mercedes-Benz:

Daimler AG (Mercedes Benz):

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dieter_Zetsche (Engineer)

Oh but wait we also have:

BMW:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norbert_Reithofer (Engineer)

Porsche:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wendelin_Wiedeking (Engineer)


Renault AND Nissan:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carlos_Ghosn (Engineer)

I'm seeing a bit of a pattern here.

It would be nice if someone could do a comparative study of vehicle company management under engineers versus non-engineers.... or maybe take a different industry that has a greater number of companies, say independent oil and gas, looking at geoscientists/engineers vs. other ceos.

Friday, February 20, 2009

Reap as ye shall sow

Page A3 if you have the hardcopy:

Californians Get a Budget That Leaves Few Happy

"A broad range of Californians will feel the pain. The plan to balance the state budget -required by law - will slam the poor, as well as the middle class, some economists said. For a household earning $150,000, the tax increases will almost wipe out the $800 per couple tax credit in the stimulus package signed by President Barack Obama this week, according to California's Legislative Analysts Office. The state taxation plan and the federal credit "work against each other," said Legislative Analyst Mac Taylor."

Comment: US Senators and Congressmen, see diagram and commentary in the post below to understand what you've done. You just made huge regressive tax increases an inevitability. I know you didn't bother to read the 1,000 page bill you passed, but I've made the diagram simple enough that even you can understand it.


U.S. Aid Won't Save Big Apple Budget from Bloomberg's Ax

"Stimulus aid must be used in specific areas, such as federal education programs, Medicaid payments, and construction projects, it can't be used to cover the cost of the city's large work force....To eliminate the gap in the city's 2010 budget, Mr. Bloomberg in last month proposed cutting social services, aid for the elderl, emergency personnel and cultural activities. That could mean reductions among fire companies and firefighters; children's services, such as child care and foster care; and cutting 1,000 police officers"

Comment: I've said it before, and I'll say it again, this earmarking of funds, especially state aid, is a fundamental problem with the stimulus package. The stimulus dollars should be disbursed to the general funds of state and local municipalities so the state and local governments, such as Bloomberg and the California state legislature, can allocate the funds instead of having their hands bound to a set of earmarks.

Now we're going to have a surplus of hole diggers and a reduction in police and fire fighters in NYC. I hope those hole diggers can save me from a burning building or fight crime. I also hope they can take care of any elderly relatives, and perform CPR should any of us have a heart attack.

But hey, what do I know? I'll just let the market speak for me.

Thursday, February 12, 2009

Only took the WSJ an extra month to realize this...

On January 10th I wrote: "The economy is like a massive pendulum, it does not stop on a dime. The boost to income (or as Larry Kudlow likes to say, massive tax cut) created by the precipitous decline in crude and gasoline prices has worked its way into the economy, possibly preventing a disastrous shopping season from being the apocalypse, but there isn't much meat left in gas prices, so further boosts to disposable income from gas are not happening."

On February 12th, the WSJ publishes: Falling Gas May Be Gone as a Stimulus - WSJ.com

Better late than never.

In other news, I've included a crude representation of what a real stimulus package would look like and what our current magical stimulus package is composed of. Its added in my tirade post.